5
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Regulation of Fe‐stress response in some crop varieties: Anomaly op a mechanism for recovery through non‐redumptive pH reduction

Pages 1-19 | Published online: 21 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

The cultivars of some crop varieties were examined for Fe‐stress tolerance by growing them in complete nutrient solutions and then transferring to one without Fe. The response to stress was rated from the onset of and recovery from chlorosis. The pH change was recorded. Several cultivars of four crop plants, viz., Cajanus indicus Spreng., Cicer arletlnum L., Corchorus capsularis L., C. olitorius L., and Oryza sativa L. In the case of pigeon‐pea, the varieties TT‐9 and TT‐11 were found to be Fe‐stress tolerant. Experiments with another set of four pigeon‐pea varieties showed that the chlorosis was severe and did not recover at all. These varieties did not show any difference whether grown in Hoagland's or Steinberg's solutions. In the case of chickpea, two varieties, BD‐9–3 and Chaffa showed remarkable Fe‐stress tolerance by reducing the pH of the medium to as low as 3.5. When the varieties of jute were subjected to Pe‐stress, JRC‐212 exhibited a very unique capacity to reduce the pH very rapidly from the next day, and remained green throughout. There was no Fe‐stress response in the case of rice even though the variety Basmati showed tolerance under upland nursery conditions.

The studies with diverse crop species revealed that there are more than one mechanisms by which the plants could regulate Fe uptake. Pigeon‐pea tolerant varieties withstand stress probably by redistributing the internal Fe. The jute variety JRC‐212 regulated by reducing the pH immediately, even without developing chlorosis. On the other hand, the varieties JRO‐832 and JRO‐7835 developed chlorosis, followed by pH reduction and chlorosis recovery. This mechanism was similar to that in sorghum, although less efficient. The chick‐pea varieties showed mild chlorosis but recovered by lowering the pH. One contrast between the tolerant jute and chick‐pea, as against sorghum is that the pH was kept low throughout, even after recovery from chlorosis, if occurred.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.