Abstract
Root cation exchange capacity (CEC) was analyzed for four cotton cultivars (Pima S‐5, Stoneville 825, Deltapine 41 and Auburn 56) within tvo species (Gossypium barbadense and G. hirsutum) grown in control (O Al) and Al (1.5 mg/l) solution. Pima S‐5, a G. barbadense variety, had significantly (P < 0.10) lower root CEC than G. hirsutum cultivars in control (O Al) solution. Root CEC of Stoneville 825 was numerically but not significantly lower than Auburn 56 and Deltapine Al in control solution. Root CEC was significantly reduced in all cultivars when grown in Al solution. Compared to controls, Pima S‐5 and Stoneville 825 had either numerically or significantly less reduction in root CEC than Auburn 56 or Deltapine 41 in Al solution. Aluminum content of roots after CEC analysis was numerically greater in the former cultivars than the latter.
The lower root CEC of Pima S‐5 and Stoneville 825 in non‐toxic conditions could provide an initially greater Al tolerance when roots grow into marginally Al toxic soil. Under sustained, Al toxic conditions, root CEC becomes altered and is more of an indirect indicator of root growth as affected by as yet undetermined Al tolerance mechanism(s).
The steady‐state technique to determine root CEC virtually eliminated the inherent problems of CO. effects on pH and titrating to an end point in a specific period of time in a dynamic system.
Key words: