9
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Responses of forage grasses to aluminum in solution culture

&
Pages 783-796 | Published online: 21 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

Growth, nutrient uptake and nutrient uptake efficiency differences in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb), and timothy (Phleum pratense L.) were evaluated at 0, 100, 200, and 300 μM Al. In each of the species, cultivar differences were also compared. In the absence of Al stress, cultivars of orchardgrass outperformed other grasses. The presence of Al reduced shoot and root growth; however, the magnitude of the growth reduction depended upon the species and cultivars. The growth of shoots and roots showed a significant difference with respect to species, cultivars, treatment Al and their Interactions. Aluminum reduced the uptake of many essential nutrients. At 100 μM Al Potomac orchardgrass had the highest and climax timothy had the lowest mineral content. The efficiency ratio (ER) assisted in classifying grass entries into efficient and inefficient utilizers of the absorbed nutrients. The ER is defined as milligrams of dry shoot weight produced per milligram of element in the shoot. The ER for P, K, Cu and Zn gave a positive correlation with shoot weight; however, in general, negative relationships were observed for shoot growth and ER for Mg, Fe, and Mn. In all the species increasing Al concentration from 0 to 100 μM increased ER for Mg and decreased ER for K and Zn. With the exception of tall fescue cultivars, the ER for P was reduced by 100 μM Al. The species and cultivars used in this study showed inter‐ and intraspecific differences in growth, uptake, and ER for nutrients in the presence or absence of Al stress. Significant reduction in growth, even at 100 μM Al by all the three species of grass indicates that these grass species are far more sensitive to Al than the field crops. Therefore, experiments with levels of Al lesser than 100 μM would have given a better outlook on the performances of these grass species.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.