28
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Salinity effects on St. Augustinegrass: A novel system to quantify stress responseFootnote1

, &
Pages 893-908 | Published online: 21 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

An objective and quantitative batch nutrient culture system was developed to assess responses of St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze) cultivars ‘Seville’ (saline tolerant) and ‘Floratam’ (saline sensitive) to salt stress. Vessels containing individual grass plugs growing in solution culture were randomized in a walk‐in growth chamber. Nutrient solutions were supplemented weekly with NaCl to gradually increase the conductivity over a three week period to treatment levels (2.4 [control], 12.4, 22.4, and 32.4 dS m‐1). Plants were sampled at the onset, and at four and eight weeks during the experiment. Cell sap was extracted from grass blades and measured with a vapor pressure osmometer to determine osmolarity and osmotic adjustment. Length and area of sample shoot and root systems and foliage color changes were measured using an adaptation of video image analysis, and dry weight (DW) was measured to determine relative growth rate (RGR). ‘Seville’ responded to increasing salt concentration with uniform stepwise increases in cell osmolarity, whereas ‘Floratam’ showed strong depression of cell osmotic potential only in the highest conductivity treatment. At high salt levels, overall shoot development was initially more inhibited for ‘Floratam’, although RGR analysis indicated recovery in the susceptible cultivar after long salt stress duration. ‘Seville’ reacted to saline stress with increased root length, whereas roots were actually stunted in saline treatments for ‘Floratam’. Stress induced an increase in the optical density of grass blades for both cultivars although foliage color was not visibly affected. A positive linear correlation (r = 0.81–0.97) was obtained between shoot area as determined by image analysis versus DW measurements. Use of this novel system maximizes assessment of turfgrass stress responses, and quantification of resistance characteristics.

Notes

This research was supported by a grant from the United States Golf Association ‐ Green Section. Our sincere thanks to Dr. A. Dudeck for donation of the grass lines and helpful advice on their relative salt tolerance, and Dr. L. Art Spotner for constructing the staging apparatus for image analysis.

Graduate Research Assistant, Assistant Professor, and Assistant Professor.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.