Efficacy of commercial Fe(III)‐EDDHA and Fe(III)‐EDDHMA chelates to supply iron to sunflower and corn seedlings

Abstract

Use of synthetic iron (Fe) chelates is the most common and effective way to treat Fe chlorosis in plants. Most commercial products contain Fe‐EDDHA or Fe‐EDDHMA but their efficacy can be quite different. Commercial products with EDDHA or EDDHMA as active components were chosen based on the data obtained by Lucena et al. (1992) in their chemical test. The chelates present extreme differences in behavior in the mentioned chemical tests. The analysis of the products revealed that the total Fe concentration is greater than the one indicated by the manufacturer in spite of a lesser amount of FeY^‐ present. The plant response to these commercial products was tested using short‐term greenhouse hydroponic cultures. Sunflower and corn were chosen because of their different behavior under Fe‐stress conditions. No significant difference between plants treated with Fe‐EDDHA or Fe‐EDDHMA chelates were observed. Since the purity index indicates there are too many differences between commercial formulations of the same type of chelate, the differentiation between groups cannot be determined with commercial products. Index I3, described by Lucena et al. (1992), does not correlate with the plant response because it did not consider the purity percentage of the products.