Growth and chloroplast ultrastructure of two citrus rootstock seedlings in response to ammonium and nitrate nutrition¹

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Series No. R‐06670.

Abstract

It is important to understand the differential response of citrus rootstock to various rates of nitrogen (N) forms in order to evaluate the tree response to N availability under different production conditions. In this study, the effects of N sources (NH₄‐N or NO₃‐N), and rates (5, 15, 45, and 135 mg N L⁻¹) on two citrus rootstock seedlings (Swingle citrumelo, SC; Cleopatra mandarin, CM) growth (110 d) and N concentrations in various parts of seedling were investigated in a nutrient solution experiment. The effects of N nutrition on the chloroplast ultrastructure of leaves were examined at the end of the experiment. Rootstock and N sources significantly influenced the growth of leaves, stems, and roots. The growth of all seedling parts of both rootstocks decreased with an increase in concentration of NH₄‐N in the solution. In contrast, there was a positive relationship between the seedling growth and the concentration of NO₃‐N in the nutrient solution with marked response observed as the NO₃‐N concentration increased from 5 to 15 mg L⁻¹ The experiment demonstrated a distinct growth suppression effect with an increase in concentration of NH₄‐N in the nutrient solution, particularly SC rootstock. Chloroplast ultra‐structure of the leaves showed evidence of injury of the seedlings which received N entirely as NH₄ ⁺ form, but the injury was not seen when the seedlings received N as the NO₃‐N form. The disruption of chloroplast ultrastructure increased with increased rate of NH₄‐N. The most conspicuous characteristic of ammonium toxicity was the massive accumulation of strands granules and phytoferritin which is clearly an evidence of NH₃ toxicity. The results are important for understanding the implications of N source on seedling growth and chloroplast structure of citrus leaves.

Notes

Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Series No. R‐06670.

Corresponding author (e‐mail address: [email protected]).