2,215
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
 

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Municipalities across the United States are gradually recognizing urban agriculture as an integral part of planning, land use, and zoning ordinances. We review the literature on the regulation of urban agriculture at a moment when policy and regulatory vacuums exist and the acceptance and integration of urban agriculture is uneven. We review the current regulatory practices of 40 metropolitan and 40 micropolitan municipalities in the 4 U.S. Census regions. We find that municipalities are filling policy vacuums by adopting enabling ordinances (zoning ordinances, land use designations, resolutions), regulations on urban agriculture production (backyard animals, built structures, practitioner responsibility), and fiscal policy instruments (restrictions on sales of agricultural products, tax abatement, urban agriculture fees). Our findings support local planning practitioners in filling regulatory gaps, practitioners of urban agriculture in seeking how it’s done elsewhere, and researchers in discerning new applied and basic research projects. We identify 3 principal knowledge gaps: Planners need a complete typology of regulatory possibilities; a better understanding of how local, state, and federal legislations constrain or enable urban agriculture; and empirical evidence of the economic, social, and environmental impacts of urban agriculture.

Takeaway for practice: Planners should assess existing urban agricultural practices and consider which regulatory frameworks best support multiple local goals, incorporating a concern with urban agriculture into ongoing activities, deploying existing or innovative land use tools, facilitating institutional cooperation, and promoting inclusive decision making and community engagement.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. We also thank Jason Hachadorian and Kyle Hearing for providing additional research assistance and Amy Laura Cahn, J.D., for her valuable feedback on an earlier draft.

Notes

1. Phone interview with S. Danko-Day, open space specialist, Department of City Planning, City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on November 10, 2015, by L. Bonarek.

2. Phone interview with J. Peterson, planner, Development Management Division, City Planning and Development, Kansas City, Missouri, on November 25, 2015, by L. Bonarek.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Mahbubur Meenar

Mahbubur Meenar ([email protected]) is an assistant professor of geography, planning, and sustainability at Rowan University in New Jersey.

Alfonso Morales

Alfonso Morales ([email protected]) is a professor of planning and landscape architecture at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Leonard Bonarek

Leonard Bonarek ([email protected]) is a regional planner for the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia (PA).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.