Abstract
Segregation is increasing in American cities, and recent city plans fail to grapple realistically with the problem. Serious questions are being raised, by both whites and blacks, as to whether integration in housing is either a strategically wise or a theoretically valid objective. The alternative of improving the ghetto is often put forward. A commitment to freedom of choice requires both some integrated housing and such action in the ghetto as its residents desire. An aggressive role for planners in fostering integration, coupled with assistance-to the ghetto in formulating its own plans and achieving the power to implement them, is recommended.