Abstract
Anomalous obsidian hydration band width readings have plagued interpretive endeavors and have been used to question the general utility of obsidian hydration as a method for establishing relative chronologies. It is argued that many anomalous band width readings follow from a failure to establish context and, therefore, appropriate controls for sample selection. The results of recent techno-hydration studies indicate that numerous anomalies can be explained. A range of interpretive benefits from combining technological and hydration analyses are recognized.