Abstract
In this paper some methodological and substantive aspects of Arend Lijphart's theory of consociational democracy are analysed. The theoretical element of his theory is discussed according to the criteria for a factor‐theory as laid down by Meehan. Three of the four main characteristics of a consociational democracy, ie grand coalition government, segmental autonomy and the principle of proportional value allocation are subsequently delineated in broadly critical and appreciative terms. The paper focuses on the causal deficiencies of consociational theory as well as its interesting and adequate narrative value in describing democratic stability in certain deeply divided or so‐called plural societies.