A Liminal Space: Challenges and opportunities in accreditation of prior learning in Judaic Studies

Abstract

The accreditation of prior learning (APL) attests to the value of learning that takes place in a non-accredited institution. In the process of accrediting such learning, criteria have to be established and assessment methodologies selected. Accreditation deals with definitions, values, ideals, searches for equivalency, and similarities in the examined learning. However, such values and examinations are located within distinctive structures of learning: the greater the difference between these structures of learning the more problematic the accreditation process. While generally true, this proposition is highlighted in the evaluation of prior learning of Judaic Studies. Such accreditation brings into contrast the learning structures of both the rabbinical ('sacred') and Western liberal higher learning ('secular'). We review the difficulties of criterion selection, current accreditation techniques, and detail those elements of the ultra-Orthodox structure of learning that are salient and problematic in accreditations. Drawing metaphorically on the works of Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner, we encourage a more theoretical, humble, and sensitive exploration of the liminal space that lies beyond structures.