Signifying authenticity in academic practice: a framework for better understanding and harnessing portfolio assessment

Abstract

Portfolios are an assessment tool that help frame expectations of personal professional learning about teaching in higher education, a key dimension of academic practice. In this paper, we review our experiences in both supporting academic colleagues to develop a teaching portfolio, and in their assessment. We argue that the authenticity of the account offered is key: participants should aspire to render an authentic account of themselves, their context, actions and their professional stance. Likewise, assessors need to verify that an account is authentic. We posit five signifiers of authenticity: biographical/professional context; practice development and experience of practice; integration of core concepts and key ideas from the literature, especially evaluation and conceptions of teaching; purpose and values in continuing professional learning (CPL); coherence of writing, vocabulary used, writing style, etc. These are intended to help course leaders and conveners of CPL activities to articulate what it is that is being sought from participants, and hence clarify expectations for both participants doing the learning and for disciplinary colleagues assisting with the assessment.

Keywords:

• portfolio assessment
• academic practice
• continuing professional learning
• higher education
• professionalism

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to colleagues at the Oxford Learning Institute and at the University of Manchester who offered helpful comments on earlier drafts. The helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers are also appreciated.