Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between take-home (open-book) examinations (THE) and in-class (closed-book) examinations (ICE) on academic performance and student wellbeing. Two social science courses (one bachelor and one master) were included in the study. In the first cohort (2019), students from both courses performed an ICE, whereas students in the second cohort (2020) performed a THE. Four to six months following course completion, students were approached to fill out a survey pertaining to their academic performance and wellbeing during the course, and to complete a test measuring knowledge retention on the course materials. No significant differences were found between the ICE and THE cohorts in academic performance and knowledge retention for either the bachelor or the master students. Bachelor students who completed a THE in 2020 reported significantly lower wellbeing in comparison to their peers completing the ICE a year earlier. The implications of the results in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic are discussed.
Disclosure statement
There are no competing interests. Both authors contributed to the conceptualisation of the research project and to the writing of the manuscript.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Tali Spiegel
Tali Spiegel is an Assistant Professor at Utrecht University. Her research interests include marginalised groups, stigma and health, with a particular focus on individuals with a disability and the LGBT community.
Amy Nivette
Amy Nivette is Associate Professor at Utrecht University. Her research interests include the determinants of institutional legitimacy and attitudes toward the law over the life course, with a particular focus on what social, experiential, and individual factors shape attitudes towards the police.