246
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Research developments in contemporary Central Eurasian studies

Pages 441-451 | Published online: 08 Aug 2006
 

Notes

1. Henry Kissinger, Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994), p 813.

2. See for example Leonard A Stone, ‘Research and Eurasia: geopolitical contours’, Perceptions—Journal of International Affairs, Vol 6, No 1, 2001, pp 135–150.

3. An excellent example of highly competent research into change and institution building is Pauline Jones Luong, Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

4. Although not for all scholars, and certainly not for John Anderson—see for example John Anderson, The International Politics of Central Asia (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997).

5. For a brief Discussion on the Turkish, Kuwaiti, Chinese and other models, see Rafis Abazov, ‘Central Asian republics’, The Slavic Research Center, 1998, accessed 22 January 2005 from: http://src-slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publicn/CentralAsia/rafis/rafis/html

6. See for example Gregory Gleason, Markets and Politics in Central Asia (London: Routledge, 2003); The Central Asian States: Discovering Independence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997).

7. See for example Oliver Roy, The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations (New York: New York University Press, 2000).

8. See especially William Fierman, ed, Soviet Central Asia: The Failed Transformation (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).

9. Robert M. Cutler, ‘The complexity of Central Eurasia’, Central Eurasian Studies Review, Vol 3, No 1, 2004, p 3.

10. Jeremy Black, Maps and History: Constructing Images of the Past (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997), p 14.

11. Robert D. Kaplan, ‘The coming anarchy’, The Atlantic Monthly, 1994.

12. See for example Hisao Koatsu, Obiya Chika and John Schoeberlein, eds, Migration in Central Asia: Its History and Current Problems, JCAS Symposium Series 9 (Osaka: Japan Centre for Area Studies, 2000); Charles King and Neil J. Mervin, Nations Abroad: Diaspora Politics and International Relations in the Former Soviet Union (Boulder, CO: Westviw Press, 1998).

13. See for example Andre Gunder Frank, Re-Orient: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998).

14. ‘A fair globalization: creating equal opportunities for all’, The Report of the World Commission, 2004, accessed 12 January 2005 from: www.ilo.org/public/english/fairglobalization/report/index.htm

15. See for example, Mehdi Parvizi Amineh, Globalization, Geopolitics and Energy Security in Central Eurasia and the Caspian Region (The Hague: Clingendael Energy, 2003).

16. Turkey will not allow the sea-lanes off the strait of Istanbul to be turned into oil pipelines. See Frank Loğoğlu, ‘Turkey in the New Century’, Turkish Daily News, 10 April 2000.

17. See for example Robert M. Cutler, ‘The Caspian energy conundrum’, Journal of International Affairs, Vol 21, No 2, 2003, pp 89–102.

18. Bruno Coppieters, Alexei Zverev and Dmitri Trenin, Commonwealth and Independence in Post-Soviet Eurasia (London: Frank Cass, 1998).

19. Alan Makovsky and Sabri Sayarı, Changing Dynamics of Turkish Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2000).

20. Mehdi Parvizi Amineh and Henk Houweling, eds, Central Eurasia in Global Politics: Conflict, Security, and Development (Leiden: Brill, 2004).

21. Ibid, p 167.

22. Ibid, p 47.

23. The Centre for Preventive Action sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations and The Century Foundation has published a number of excellent reports on inter-ethnic difficulties. See for example ‘Calming the Ferghana Valley: development and dialogue in the heart of Central Eurasia’, Report of the Ferghana Valley Working Group of the Center for Preventive Action (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 1999).

24. For a variation on this theme—the cross-border region (CBR)—see Markus Perkmann and Ngai-Ling Sum, eds, Globalization, Regionalization and Cross Border Regions (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2002).

25. Edward W. Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin, 1978), p 50.

26. This is a contentious point that some scholars will not accept, believing that a Eurocentic view still holds sway in many Western academic institutions. For a view on non-Eurocentic research in Central Asian studies see Korkut A. Ertűrk, ed, Rethinking Central Asia: Non-Eurocentric Studies in History, Social Structure and Identity (Reading, UK: Ithaca Press, 1999).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Leonard Stone

Leonard Stone, Visiting lecturer in a number of universities in Turkey, Hungary, Czech Republic, India and Afghanistan, London, UK.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.