371
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effect of the Self-explain–Discuss–Re-explain (SDR) learning strategy on high- and low-achieving fifth-grade students’ achievement in science

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Being able to think independently is a must for students to construct new knowledge in their minds. Self-explaining is a constructive learning strategy that encourages students to think for themselves and to make inferences that go beyond the given information. The Self-explain–Discuss–Re-explain (SDR) strategy adapted from self-explaining is expected to be able to help students learn science and foster the habit of independent thinking.

Purpose

This study employs a quasi-experimental design to investigate the effects of SDR and traditional strategies on high- and low-achieving fifth-grade students’ achievement in learning about the position and motion of the sun.

Participants

Altogether 104 students participated in this study, with the 52 receiving the SDR strategy designated as the experimental group, and the other 52 receiving the traditional strategy designated as the comparison group. Each student was classified as a high- or low-achiever based on their test scores from the final science exam the previous semester.

Design and methods

The research instrument for this study was a two-tier multiple-choice test. We used this test for both pre- and post-tests of the experimental group and the comparison group, and then performed statistical analysis on the data obtained from the pre- and post-tests.

Results

The findings show that the SDR strategy was more effective at helping high- and low-achievers learn about the sun’s position and motion and in helping close the achievement gap between them than the traditional strategy was.

Conclusions

The SDR strategy can help low-achievers catch up with their high-achieving classmates. It can be used to remedy low-achieving students’ weaknesses in a specific area of science.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.