ABSTRACT
Despite the perceived importance of sleep for elite footballers, descriptions of the duration and quality of sleep, especially following match play, are limited. Moreover, recovery responses following sleep loss remain unclear. Accordingly, the present study examined the subjective sleep and recovery responses of elite footballers across training days (TD) and both day and night matches (DM and NM). Sixteen top division European players from three clubs completed a subjective online questionnaire twice a day for 21 days during the season. Subjective recall of sleep variables (duration, onset latency, time of wake/sleep, wake episode duration), a range of perceptual variables related to recovery, mood, performance and internal training loads and non-exercise stressors were collected. Players reported significantly reduced sleep durations for NM compared to DM (−157 min) and TD (−181 min). In addition, sleep restfulness (SR; arbitrary scale 1 = very restful, 5 = not at all restful) and perceived recovery (PR; acute recovery and stress scale 0 = not recovered at all, 6 = fully recovered) were significantly poorer following NM than both TD (SR: +2.0, PR: −2.6), and DM (SR: +1.5; PR: −1.5). These results suggest that reduced sleep quantity and quality and reduced PR are mainly evident following NM in elite players.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the players for their time and participation. Much gratitude is also reserved for the coaches, fitness coaches and medical doctors for their assistance and enthusiasm towards the project. The authors would also like to thank Michael Kellmann and Michael Fuchs for their expertise and guidance during the construction phase of the questionnaire. Parts of the questionnaire were based upon the questionnaire developed as part of the RegMan—Optimization of Training and Competition: Management of Regeneration in Elite Sports project (IIA1-081901/12-16) which was initiated and funded by the German Federal Institute of Sport Science. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.