854
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Physical Activity for Health

Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults

, , , , , & show all
Pages 206-212 | Accepted 05 Feb 2017, Published online: 23 Feb 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Wrist-based accelerometers are increasingly used to assess physical activity (PA) in population-based studies; however, cut-points to translate wrist-based accelerometer counts into PA intensity categories are still needed. The purpose of this study was to determine wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory PA in adults for the Actical accelerometer. Healthy adults (n = 24) completed a four-phase treadmill exercise protocol (1.9, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.2 mph) while wearing an Actical accelerometer on their wrist. Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) levels were assessed by indirect calorimetry. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to determine accelerometer counts that maximised sensitivity and specificity for classification of moderate (≥3 METs) and vigorous (>6 METs) ambulatory activity. The area under the ROC curves to discriminate moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory activity were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90–0.97; P < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; P < 0.001), respectively. The identified cut-point for moderate-intensity ambulatory activity was 1031 counts per minute, which had a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 85.6% and 87.5%, respectively. The identified cut-point for vigorous intensity ambulatory activity was 3589 counts per minute, which had a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 88.0% and 98.7%, respectively. This study established intensity-specific cut-points for wrist-based wear of the Actical accelerometer which are recommended for quantification of moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory activity.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under R01-HL098037 (JE Schwartz); NHLBI/NIH under grant P01-HL088117; NHLBI/NIH Diversity Supplement under R01-HL116470-02S1 (KM Diaz); NHLBI/NIH under K23-HL098359 (IM Kronish); and NHLBI/NIH under R01-HL123368

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.