1,286
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Medicine and Biomechanics

Upper extremity muscle activity and joint loading changes between the standard and powerlifting bench press techniques

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 1055-1063 | Accepted 30 Dec 2021, Published online: 02 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The bench press is a common activity found in many exercise regimens. Powerlifters often adopt non-standard techniques to potentially enhance maximal capability. The purpose of this research was to examine muscle activation and joint loading differences between the powerlifting (Arch) and standardised techniques. Twenty experienced male lifters completed lifts at an instructed cadence in the arch and the National Strength and Conditioning Association standard techniques at 25%, 50% and 75% of their self-reported one rep maximum. The arch technique increased latissimus dorsi mean and peak activation (p < 0.0001), generating activation of approximately 13% maximal voluntary contraction, regardless of percentage of the one rep maximum lifted. The standardised technique resulted in integrated shoulder moments that were 8% larger (p < 0.0001). This latissimus dorsi activation paired with decreased shoulder loading in the arch technique likely acts to minimise the amount of time spent in the “sticking region”, where most lift efforts fail. It is possible to use this technique to increase latissimus dorsi activation, without increasing overall shoulder loading. The technique-specific differences can be used in performance or rehabilitation-based programmes to increase muscular output of some muscles without increasing overall loading.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant [311895-2016].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.