Maximal isometric force and muscle cross‐sectional area of the forearm in fencers

Abstract

The maximal isometric force (MIF) of a muscle is directly related to its cross‐sectional area (CSA). Strength training produces an increase in muscular force while muscular hypertrophy becomes appreciable at a later time; in asymmetric sports, training causes significant increases in force and muscular mass of the dominant limb of the athlete. The aim of this study was to analyse the differences in muscular force and trophism between the dominant and non‐dominant forearms in fencers and in controls.

The data of 17 male distance runners (age 21.4±2.4 years, body mass 74.0±5.0 kg, height 180 ± 6 cm) were compared with those of 58 male fencers (age 23.0 ± 6.7 years, body mass 71.9±9.3 kg, height 178 ± 7 cm) drawn from the ranking lists of the National Fencing Committee. They trained for a mean of 11.4±6.0 (range 2–36) years, commencing at 10.7 ± 4.5 years of age.

Cross‐sectional area (muscle plus bone) was estimated in the dominant and non‐dominant forearm using a simplified anthropometric method. Maximal isometric force was determined using a mechanical handgrip dynamometer. The differences in CSA and isometric force between the two limbs and between fencers and controls were tested using paired and unpaired Student's i‐tests, respectively. Significant differences in CSA and maximal force were observed between the dominant and non‐dominant forearm in fencers (both P<0.001) and in controls (P<0.005 and P<0.001, respectively). The fencers showed a greater CSA (P<0.001) and force (P< 0.001) in the dominant forearm compared with the control group. Furthermore, the differences between the dominant and non‐dominant limb of the fencers were significantly greater than the differences between the dominant and non‐dominant limb of the controls (P<0.001 for CSA and P<0.05 for force). No significant differences in stress ratio (force/CSA) were obtained in either group.

The results of this study suggest that asymmetric sports training at submaximal intensities produces significant asymmetries in force and CSA which are independent of technical level and years of training. Despite this, the force/CSA ratio is constant and independent of training.

Keywords:

• Cross‐sectional area
• fencing
• maximal isometric force
• training

Notes

Address all correspondence to V. Margonato, c/o ITBA ‐ CNR, Via Ampere 56, 20131 Milano, Italy.