385
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cortisol reactivity, maternal sensitivity, and infant preference for mother's familiar face and rhyme in 6‐month‐old infants

&
Pages 143-167 | Received 22 Jun 2007, Accepted 13 Jan 2008, Published online: 13 May 2009
 

Abstract

This study investigated how cortisol (stress) reactivity and mothers' behavioural sensitivity affect familiarity preferences in 6‐month‐old infants. Relations between sensitivity and stress were explored using saliva samples taken from mothers and infants before, and 20 min after, two preferential looking experiments. Photographs and voice recordings from infants' mothers were incorporated into standard visual preference tasks. Sensitivity was assessed by determining the degree of behavioural synchrony between mother and infant from a 10‐min interaction period preceding the preferential looking experiments. Results showed that decreasing infant cortisol reactivity and greater maternal sensitivity were associated with familiarity preferences for mother's face stimuli. For the experiment with voice stimuli, a sex difference was obtained in the relationship between the directionality of cortisol reactivity and familiarity preferences. Results are related to a parallel study with 3‐month‐old infants, and issues are discussed in terms of infants' developing emotional independence from mother.

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by a NIH NIGMS grant (#3S06 GM008136) and the NIH MBRS RISE grant program (#6M61222). We thank Elizabeth Arias, Leila Diaz, Carla Escabi‐Ruiz, Lori Fields, Erin Johns, Denisse Licon, Xavier Peña, Katie Silva, and Roseanna Villarreal, for help with data collection and coding, Dr. Megan Gunnar for her helpful comments, and the mothers and infants who participated in this study.

Notes

1. To establish whether or not there was a difference in cortisol reactivity between those infants with usable looking time data and those without, two‐tailed paired samples t‐tests were conducted between log10 T1 and T2 values for infants whose looking time data could not be analyzed, separately for the faces and rhymes experiments. As was the case in the larger sample, log10 T1 and T2 values for the infants whose looking time data could not be included were not significantly different from each other, for both the faces and the rhymes experiment (p>.05).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.