1,138
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A longitudinal study on the maternal–fetal relationship and postnatal maternal sensitivity

, , , &
Pages 110-121 | Received 10 Jul 2014, Accepted 14 Sep 2015, Published online: 26 Nov 2015
 

Abstract

Objective: The present study examined whether early signs of maternal sensitivity can be detected during pregnancy by focusing on the maternal–fetal relationship and postnatal maternal sensitivity. Background: Earlier research has identified maternal sensitive behaviour as an important factor for the quality of the mother–infant relationship and the child’s emotional and cognitive development later in life. Research on this topic has predominantly focused on the postnatal period and little is known about early predictors (i.e. during pregnancy) of maternal sensitivity. Methods: Participants were 273 women and their (unborn) infants. Mothers’ attitudes, thoughts and feelings towards the fetus were assessed by the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale at 26 weeks of gestation. At the infant’s age of 6 months, maternal sensitivity was assessed in three different situations (i.e. face-to-face play, caregiving and free play) using the NICHD global rating scales. Results: Mothers with a higher quality of the maternal–fetal relationship displayed more maternal sensitivity towards their 6-month-old infant in caregiving and free play situations, even when controlling for covariates such as parity, ethnicity, maternal education, maternal age and the postnatal mother–infant relationship. No associations were found in the face-to-face situation. Conclusion: This study shows that mothers who reported a higher quality of the maternal–fetal relationship were more sensitive while interacting with their infants during caregiving and free play, but not during face-to-face play.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all families participating in this study. We are also grateful to the collaborating midwives for their contributions to the study and their help in recruiting participants.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) [grant number 157001020] and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg (date 13-08-2008, NL 23376.00808).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) [grant number 157001020] and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg (date 13-08-2008, NL 23376.00808).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.