425
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Recipient and donor experiences of known egg donation: implications for fertility counselling

, , &
Pages 354-366 | Received 19 Dec 2018, Accepted 12 Jul 2019, Published online: 28 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Objective

To explore the experiences of known egg donors and recipients in order to inform counselling practise.

Background

Relatively little is known about known egg donation as a form of family-building in the UK, and on the experiences of individuals who have sought this form of donation. As such, there is a lack of guidance for fertility counselling in this area.

Method

This was a cross-sectional, qualitative study. A purposive sample of four recipient women were recruited via a national support group for women experiencing Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI). Known egg donors (n = 3) and recipient men (n = 3) were recruited via a snowball sample, as identified by recipient women. In-depth interviews were conducted with participants. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Four themes were generated from the data: 1) ‘Doing anything’: existing relationships as the motivation to donate; 2) ‘It was my duty’: feelings of obligation to donate and to receive; 3) ‘Woman-to-woman’: a woman-centred experience; and 4) ‘Going through this together’: changed versus unchanged relationships.

Conclusions

The study highlights a number of implications in known egg donation, arising from the relationships involved. It is recommended that these implications are considered by infertility counsellors in the provision of counselling, and by those undergoing known egg donation when seeking information and support, before, during and after the donation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ten individuals who were willing to share their personal experiences of known egg donation. Thank you also to Eric Blyth and Ruth Deery for their feedback on early drafts of the paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by University of Huddersfield [PhD Studentship].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.