421
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 228-241 | Received 30 Apr 2020, Accepted 30 Sep 2020, Published online: 28 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives

To describe the translation and cultural adaptation, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale when applied to Brazilian pregnant women.

Background

Poor body image of pregnant women is associated with negative outcomes for maternal and child health. However, there is a lack of psychometric studies aiming to evaluate the body image experiences during pregnancy.

Methods

A methodological study was carried out with 187 Brazilian pregnant women. We performed translation and cross-cultural adaptation (evidence of content validity), and evaluated the psychometric properties (factorial validity through principal component analysis, discriminant validity, and estimated internal consistency) of the Brazilian version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale.

Results

The scale items presented semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual equivalences, showing evidence of content validity. Principal component analysis resulted in a 6-factor structure with 35 items which showed an adequate adjustment of the scale among Brazilian pregnant women. Adequate estimated internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .88) was found. The Brazilian version was not able to discriminate pregnant women from different gestational age.

Conclusion

The Brazilian version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale showed evidence of content validity, factorial validity, and estimated internal consistency.

Acknowledgments

We thank Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz for authorizing the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the BIPS and for helping us clarifying questions during the translation. We also thank the Brazilian pregnant women.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was not funded by any organisation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.