44
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Anti‐aflatoxin mutagenic factors in corn

, &
Pages 269-279 | Received 11 Dec 1995, Accepted 30 Sep 1996, Published online: 10 Jan 2009
 

Abstract

Extracts, isolated through sequential fractionation and partition procedures described previously (Martinez et al. 1994) from aflatoxin‐free corn and aflatoxin‐con‐taminated corn with and without ammonia treatment, were investigated for mutagenic potential using the Ames test (TA 100 tester strain). 2‐Aminofluorene (2‐AF) and pure aflatoxin B1 (AFB 1 ) were used as positive controls. Although TA100 showed mutagenic response to pure AFB1 at a dose of ca 10 ng/plate, all isolates tested from ammonia‐treated aflatoxin‐con‐taminated corn containing 7500 ng AFB1/g did not exhibit positive results in the Ames test. Additionally, isolates from non‐ammonia‐treated aflatoxin‐contami‐nated corn failed to give positive mutagenic potentials. These results indicate that differences between the mutagenic potentials of pure aflatoxins and of aflatoxins in naturally‐contaminated corn exist. CH2Cl2extracts (the fractions containing aflatoxins) obtained from aflatoxin‐contaminated corn with and without ammonia treatment were applied to preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC) in an effort to separate aflatoxins and/or ammonia/aflatoxin reaction products from the ‘unknown interfering materials’ existing in the corn matrix. Each of the fractions separated by TLC was tested by the Ames test with S9 activation and none of them gave a mutagenic response to TA 100. CH2Cl2extracts in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) obtained from non‐ammonia‐treated aflatoxin‐free corn were spiked with pure AFB1 and tested by TA 100 with S9 activation. Again, no positive responses were observed. These findings provide further evidence of ‘unknown interfering materials’ in corn which may bind with aflatoxin and/or can be extracted by CH2Cl2 together with aflatoxin, and, therefore, block the mutagenic activity of aflatoxin in the Ames test. Those materials were not separated from the aflatoxins by the TLC technique used in the present study. Possible reasons and further studies required to evaluate this phenomenon are discussed.

Notes

Present address: Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.

Present address: Department of Food Science, Food Science Building 111, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803–4200, U.S.A.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.