908
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Safety and effect on ablation size of hydrochloric acid-perfused radiofrequency ablation in animal livers

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 925-933 | Received 17 Dec 2017, Accepted 12 Feb 2018, Published online: 26 Feb 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to determine the safety and ablation size of hydrochloric acid-perfused radiofrequency ablation (HCl-RFA) in liver tissues, prospectively using in vivo rabbit and ex vivo porcine liver models.

Materials and methods: The livers in 30 rabbits were treated in vivo with perfusions of normal saline (controls) and HCl concentrations of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%, during RFA at 103 °C and 30 W for 3 min. For each experimental setting, six ablations were created. Safety was assessed by comparing baseline weight and selected laboratory values with those at 2, 7, and 14 days’ post-ablation, and by histopathological analysis. The livers in 25 pigs were treated ex vivo with the same five perfusions during RFA at 103 °C, at both 30 W and 60 W, for 30 min. Ablation diameters and volumes were measured by two examiners.

Results: Rabbit weights and selected laboratory values did not differ significantly from baseline to 7 and 14 days’ post-ablation, liver tissues outside the ablation zones were normal histologically, and adjacent organs showed no macroscopic damage. The mean ablation volumes in the porcine livers treated with HCl-RFA were all larger than those treated with normal saline perfusion during RFA (NS-RFA), at both 30 W and 60 W (p < 0.001). The largest ablation volume and transverse diameter were observed in the porcine livers during 10% HCl-RFA at 60 W, measuring 179.22 (SD = 24.79) cm3 and 6.84 (SD = 0.36) cm, respectively.

Conclusions: Based on our experiments, HCl-RFA in the liver appears to be as safe as NS-RFA while also resulting in larger ablation zones.

Disclosure statement

There are no any actual or potential conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81371652), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81771955), Guangzhou Science and Technology Program key projects of collaborative innovation of health medicine (No. 201704020228), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program key projects of collaborative innovation of production, learning and research (No. 201704020134).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.