Abstract
Most of the linear statistics deal with data lying in a Euclidean space. However, there are many examples, such as DNA molecule topological structures, in which the initial or the transformed data lie in a non-Euclidean space. To get a measure of variability in these situations, the principal component analysis (PCA) is usually performed on a Euclidean tangent space as it cannot be directly implemented on a non-Euclidean space. Instead, principal geodesic analysis (PGA) is a new tool that provides a measure of variability for nonlinear statistics. In this paper, the performance of this new tool is compared with that of the PCA using a real data set representing a DNA molecular structure. It is shown that due to the nonlinearity of space, the PGA explains more variability of the data than the PCA.
Acknowledgement
We wish to thank an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions that helped us improve this paper. This research was in part supported by a grant from IPM (NO. 89620011).