![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to meta-analytically test a novel theoretical model examining a dual stressor and dual process model relating demands in the work domain to outcomes in the nonwork domain. The foundation for this model rested upon the challenge-hindrance framework and the role depletion and role enhancement perspectives derived from role theory as applied to the work-nonwork interface. The results show mixed support for the proposed model. In line with the challenge-hindrance framework the effects of challenge stressors were less detrimental than hindrance stressors. However, contrary to what has been reported for work domain outcomes, the net effect of both challenges and hindrances on nonwork domain outcomes was negative. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. We recognise that both work-nonwork conflict and enrichment are bidirectional constructs such that work can conflict with and/or enrich nonwork and that nonwork can conflict with and/or enrich work. In the present study, however, we examine the work to nonwork direction. This is not meant to imply that the nonwork to work direction is unimportant. Rather our focus was on the challenge hindrance framework, a model of work-role stressors, and there is no similar taxonomy that parallels the C–H framework for demands in the nonwork domain.