Publication Cover
Work & Stress
An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations
Volume 35, 2021 - Issue 2
3,453
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Systematic literature review of psychological interventions for first responders

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 193-215 | Received 05 Feb 2019, Accepted 29 Mar 2020, Published online: 04 May 2020
 

ABSTRACT

We conducted a systematic review of the empirical literature examining the effectiveness of psychological interventions for post-traumatic symptomatology in police, firefighters, and paramedic personnel. The review process was guided by the PRISMA statement (Moher et al. [2009]. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097) and Institute of Medicine’s Standards for Systematic Reviews (IOM [2011]. Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. nihlibrary.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Finding_What_Works_in_Health_Care_StandardsforSystematic_Reviews_IOM_2011.pdf). An inter-disciplinary, multi-national research team with expertise in mental health trauma and occupational stress in high risk professions was engaged at each stage of the review. Two team members rated each study in terms of quality and contribution to the research question. Twenty-one studies were identified: 9 case studies, 2 single-group studies, 8 randomised controlled trials, and 2 studies examining work leave. Most of the studies were limited by small sample sizes and absence of active control conditions. Research limitations reduce the ability to draw definitive best practices recommendations; however, the increase in randomised controlled trials provides encouraging signs that trauma-focused psychotherapies can be effective for first responders.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Haugen et al. (Citation2012) included 2 studies of responders following a single disaster (e.g. the World Trade Center attack). We focused the current review on studies that evaluated interventions addressing the effects of ongoing day-to-day trauma exposure.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by WorkSafeBC specific priorities grant.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.