This paper presents a philosophical critique of the widely accepted ‘technological’ conception of policy analysis in education. With the use of a Wittgensteinian understanding of language, it is argued that the assumptions upon which the technological conception is based are fundamentally mistaken. In particular it is argued that the fact‐value distinction is epistemologically incoherent, and that questions of moral value, which lie at the heart of all educational problems, can be rationally debated and assessed, and that they therefore should be regarded as integeral to educational policy analysis. With this philosophical undergrowth cleared, we can now work towards formulating a view of policy analysis as practical reason.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.