486
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The phonological Mismatch Negativity and P300 as diagnostic tools in stroke-related aphasia recovery: a longitudinal multiple case study

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 1263-1280 | Received 11 Feb 2020, Accepted 13 Jun 2020, Published online: 14 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Recovery from stroke-related aphasia follows different stages, evolving from the acute and subacute phase (< 6 months post stroke) into the chronic phase (> 6 months post stroke). In general, phonology remains tenaciously disturbed, making it a relevant language marker to assess in every stage of recovery. The classical behavioural evaluation of phonological abilities in patients with aphasia can be extended with a registration of event-related potentials (ERPs), for example, the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and the P300. ERPs have been suggested (1) to contain indications towards the language recovery progress (Nolfe et al. 2006. The role of P300 in the recovery of post-stroke global aphasia. European Journal of Neurology, 13(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01237.x) and (2) to provide additional and (more) sensitive information along with the behavioural results (Aerts, Batens et al. Citation2015. Aphasia therapy early after stroke: Behavioural and neurophysiological changes in the acute and post-acute phases. Aphasiology, 29(7), 845–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.996520). In this longitudinal study, we aimed to corroborate these previous findings.

Methods and procedures

In four patients with aphasia after a first-ever stroke, we administered behavioural language tasks as well as phonological ERPs in the (sub)acute and in the chronic stage of recovery.

Outcomes and results

The results demonstrate that the early presence of a P300 could be considered as an indicator of better recovery of language comprehension over time. For the MMN, such an indicative value remains to be confirmed. Moreover, abnormal ERP amplitudes or latencies accompanied behavioural ceiling effects in the chronic stage, suggesting a sensitivity of phonological ERPs for subtle language deficits that could not be detected by the established behavioural instruments.

Conclusions

The added values of phonological ERPs advocate their implementation in aphasia rehabilitation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Special Research Fund (BOF) of Ghent University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.