232
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Our experience with using a uniform prophylactic protocol in neurosurgery: surgical-site infection did not occur in 272 operations

, , , &
Pages 396-399 | Received 23 Oct 2017, Accepted 10 May 2018, Published online: 24 May 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a source of concern in any surgical procedure. Although studies with high numbers of patients are available, most of these studies were performed by different surgeons and the exact anti-SSI protocol is not mentioned or is not homogeneous in all patients.

Materials and methods: We present the results of 272 cases where SSI was successfully prevented in our neurosurgical units and in this study we explain our institutional protocol for achieving this positive result. We included all neurosurgical procedures in our two centers that needed an operating room, undertaken between 9 November 2015 and 6 December 2016, retrospectively. Then we compare our results with the existing literature.

Results: We performed 272 neurosurgical procedures on 245 patients. 155 patients were male and 90 were female. We re-operated on 24 patients and 3 of them operated on three times in each instance case and others were operated on twice. The patient’s ages ranged from 2 to 86years with the mean being 42.39 ± 19 years. The cranial site of surgery was more common (129 procedures, 47.4%) and overall 118 operations (43.4%) were accompanied with a prosthetic device placement. We performed 96 emergency procedures. The mean hospitalization time was 6.19 ± 6.77 days. We followed all patients for at least six months. There were no reports of SSI in our neurosurgical units.

Conclusion: With a fixed protocol of antisepsis, hand protection and prophylactic antibiotics, there were achieved good results. We recommend the current protocol as an effective measure in the control of infection in the neurosurgical ward. However, further studies are needed with more patients and a stronger study design.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.