Abstract
Background
Craniovertebral decompression is performed for symptomatic Chiari malformation type 1, with or without syringomyelia. In a few patients the symptoms and/or syrinx persist or recur, in which case revision surgery may be offered. The aim of this study was to examine the cause of failure of primary surgery and to assess the outcomes for revision cranio-vertebral decompression.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed all revision cranio-vertebral decompressions performed in our centre over an eighteen-year period. A total of 35 patients were identified (23 females; 12 males). Twenty patients had isolated Chiari malformation type 1 and a further fifteen had associated syringomyelia. The mean follow up period was 4-years (range:1–12 years).
Results
The mean time to revision was 7 years after the primary surgery. The commonest operative finding was that of dense arachnoid scar tissue, obstructing movement of CSF across the craniovertebral junction. Overall, 32 of the 35 patients reported improvement after surgery, including all 15 patients with syringomyelia. Improvement was maintained in the longer term in more than two thirds of those patients who underwent revision craniovertebral decompression.
Conclusions
Failure of primary craniovertebral decompression for Chiari malformation most often results from the formation dense scar tissue at the operation site, obstructing CSF movement. Revision cranio-vertebral decompression can provide early symptomatic relief in most patients and this benefit is sustained in at least two thirds of cases, in the medium term at least. Patients with concomitant syringomyelia appear to derive most benefit from revision surgery.
Ethical approval
This is a retrospective review of clinical cases operated on for the purposes of treatment of recurrent symptoms in the context of Chiari 1 type malformation with or without syringomyelia. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards or the institutional research committee (Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This is a retrospective study and therefore for this type of study formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for the operative procedures they underwent.
Disclosure statement
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.