101
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison the effect of bupivacaine plus magnesium sulfate with ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate infiltration on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy with general anesthesia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 256-259 | Received 02 Apr 2020, Accepted 04 Dec 2020, Published online: 17 Dec 2020
 

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we investigated the effect of local injection of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with magnesium sulfate on postoperative pain in vertebral laminectomy surgery.

Design

This randomized double-blind prospective study was conducted among 60 patients aged 18–65 years old with ASA class I and II.

Methods

Group RM: (30 people) received 70 mg ropivacaine (14 ml) plus 1 ml magnesium sulfate (500 mg) volume up to 20 ml with normal saline. Group BM: (30 people) received 70 mg bupivacaine (14 ml) plus 1 ml magnesium sulfate (500 mg) volume up to 20 ml with normal saline. The results were analyzed by SPSS 23 software, and statistical analysis consisted of χ2 test and t-test, and a p value less than .05 was considered significant.

Findings

Mean pain score based on VAS in 6 and 12 h after surgery in the RM group was lower in the BM group (p < 0.05). The analgesic request frequency in the RM group was lower than the BM group (p = 0.01). The mean morphine consumption in the RM group was 185 mg and in the BM group was 220 mg. According to the T-test, there was a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.03). there was no significant difference between the mean arterial blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups at 6, 12, 24 and 24 h after surgery (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed that wound infiltration with ropivacaine and magnesium sulfate compared to bupivacaine and magnesium sulfate provided better postoperative analgesia and significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.