Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebellopontine meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

To (1) measure surgical outcomes associated with stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas, and (2) determine if differences in radiation dosages or preoperative tumor volumes affect surgical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was performed on the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases searching for patients under stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle. After data extraction and Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessment, meta-analysis of the data was performed with Review Manager 3.4.5.

Results

In total, 6 studies including 406 patients were included. Postprocedure, patients had minimal cranial nerve complications while having an overall tumor control rate of 95.6%. Complications were minimal with facial nerve deficits occurring in 2.4%, sensation deficits of the trigeminal nerve in 4.0%, hearing loss in 5.9%, hydrocephalus in 2.0% and diplopia in 2.6% of all patients. Individuals with tumors extending into the internal auditory canal extension did not have significantly increases in hearing loss. There was a higher likelihood of tumor regression on postprocedure imaging in studies with a median prescription dose of >13 Gy (RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.04–1.56, p = 0.0225). There was no evidence of publication bias detected.

Conclusions

Radiosurgery is an effective modality for offering excellent tumor control of CPA meningiomas while allowing for only minimal complications postprocedure. A higher prescription dose may achieve higher tumor regression at follow up. Future studies should aim at establishing and optimizing accurate dosimetric guidelines for this patient population.

Keywords:

• Cerebellopontine angle
• hearing preservation
• marginal dose
• maximal dose
• meningioma
• outcomes
• postmeatal
• premeatal
• stereotactic radiosurgery

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.