Control before Collaborative Research – Why Phase Zero Is Not Co-Designed but Scripted

ABSTRACT

The very beginning of collaborative research endeavors often lies in politically difficult and practically challenging entanglements. The purpose of this paper is to empirically capture and theoretically conceptualize these entanglements. I trace the power-driven prefiguration of my own role in a transdisciplinary project and argue that the early moments (the ‘phase zero’) of collaborative research are entwined with a tacit, tactical, and relational form of control. In a process that I call ‘scripting control,’ actors seek to co-determine what a project may become, without being able to forecast or backcast a pathway to get there. Collaborators mutually launch counter-scripts and tacitly shape the possibility space that constrains or enables subsequent interactions. My own transdisciplinary involvement illustrates, however, that counter-scripts proposed by latecomers can fail if the project has passed the phase zero. This argument extends the current use of scripts in Science and Technology Studies to also involve temporal power dynamics. Moreover, in sustainability studies, my argument contributes to a growing critique against the imaginary of co-design, which promotes a managerial idea of ordering collaborative processes in a socially and epistemically inclusive way.

KEYWORDS:

• Control
• scripts
• dromocracy
• transdisciplinary sustainability studies

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Jeremias Herberg

Jeremias Herberg studied Sociology in Vienna; Science and Technology Studies in Maastricht; He was a Visiting Scholar at UC Berkeley and subsequently gained his PhD in sustainability studies from Leuphana University Lüneburg. His research explores the scope for cross-field collaboration in transformation processes. His dissertation on the so-called skills gap developed a field-theoretical approach and shows, based on regional comparisons and a two-year organizational ethnography, how educational organizations deal with regional economic expectations. In a post-doctoral project he examined the knowledge–historical entwinement of transdisciplinary research approaches with politics and industry. At the Institute for Advance Sustainability Studies (IASS) Potsdam he is currently involved in and leading research projects that explore collaborative formats within ecological transformations, especially the coal phase-out in the region of Lusatia.