https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-5925
![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
Abstract
Pantocsekiella comensis is ubiquitous in the Laurentian Great Lakes and is an important indicator of climate change and low nutrients. Pantocsekiella comensis forms a diverse complex with high morphological diversity. We distinguished three species within the complex: P. comensis, Pantocsekiella delicatula, and Pantocsekiella laurentiana sp. nov. by examining specimens from the Great Lakes using light and scanning electron microscopy. All species have radial, uniform, and alveolate striae, a central fultoportula, a rimoportula opposite the central fultoportula, and marginal fultoportulae. However, P. laurentiana has a smaller diameter than P. comensis (4–8 µm vs. 4–12 µm) and orbiculi depressi on half its tangentially undulated centre. Pantocsekiella delicatula has a distinct central fultoportula and colliculate centre, and lacks the orbiculi depressi and tangential undulation of P. comensis and P. laurentiana. Its diameter (4–14 µm) is generally larger than that of P. comensis. A multiple factor analysis based on morphological features, in addition to environmental characteristics, confirmed the separation of these species. The presence of transitional specimens with features of two or more of these species complicated classification; however, these occurrences were rare, and differentiation was usually possible.
Acknowledgements
M. Agbeti supported analysis of EPA-GLNPO phytoplankton samples and K. Kennedy contributed to sample collection and preparation. We thank Dr. Tsutomu Shimotori at the University of Minnesota Duluth Research Instrumentation Lab for assistance with the scanning electron microscope. This research was partly supported by a grant to E. Reavie from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement GL-00E23101-2. This document has not been subjected to the EPA’s required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the view of the Agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
ORCID
Elizabeth E. Alexson http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-5925
Euan D. Reavie http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-5809