Systematic review of high-level mobility training in people with a neurological impairment

ABSTRACT

Aim: The objective of this paper was to systematically review the efficacy of interventions targeting high-level mobility skills in people with a neurological impairment.

Methods: A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted. Study designs were graded using the American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) system and methodological quality was described using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.

Results: Twelve exploratory studies (AACPDM levels IV/V), of limited methodological quality (PEDro scores of 2–3 out of 10), were included. Interventions included treadmill training, a three-phase programme, a high-level mobility group, plyometric training, running technique coaching and walk training with blood flow restriction. Diagnoses included acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, incomplete spinal cord injury and neurofibromatosis type 1. There were difficulties generalizing results from exploratory designs with a broad range of participants, interventions and outcome measures. However, it seems that people with a neurological impairment have the capacity to improve high-level mobility skills, running speed and distance with intervention. There were no adverse events that limited participation.

Conclusion: There is preliminary evidence to support the efficacy of interventions to improve high-level mobility skills in people with neurological impairments. Well-controlled research with a larger sample is required to provide sufficient evidence to change clinical practice.

KEYWORDS:

• Running
• motor skills
• rehabilitation
• physiotherapy
• neurological disorder

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gabriele Moriello (Moriello et al.) and Gavin Williams (Williams et al.) for answering questions regarding their studies. The authors also thank Janet Hough, Cate Clancy, Rachel Toovey and Ebonie Rio for editing assistance.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report one conflict of interest that author GW is responsible for two articles included in this review. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

Financial support was provided to the corresponding author in the form of an Emerging Researcher Fellowship, awarded by the Monash Health Research Directorate in 2014. This funding paid the 0.2EFT salary of the corresponding author for 12 months during search design and implementation.