250
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Retrospective analysis of small intracranial hemorrhage in trauma: Is acute care surgery team management alone safe?

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 886-892 | Received 06 Aug 2020, Accepted 18 Apr 2021, Published online: 16 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) provide a validated framework for categorizing patients with small intracranial haemorrhages (ICH) who could be managed by acute care surgery without neurosurgical consultation or repeat head computed tomography in the absence of neurological deterioration. This replication study retrospectively applied BIG criteria to ICH subjects and only included BIG1 and BIG2 subjects.

Methods: The trauma registry was queried from 2014 to 2019 for subjects with a traumatic ICH <1 cm, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14/15 and not on anticoagulation therapy. Patients were then categorized under BIG 1 or BIG2 and outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Two hundred fourteen subjects were reviewed (88 BIG1 and 126 BIG2). Twenty-three subjects had worse repeat imaging, but only one had worsening exam that resolved spontaneously. None required neurosurgical intervention. One died of non-neurological causes.

Conclusions: Retrospective analysis supported our hypothesis that patients categorized as BIG1 or BIG2 could have been safely managed by acute care surgeons without neurosurgical consultation or repeat head imaging. A review of minor worsening on repeat imaging without changes in neurological exams and no need for neurosurgical interventions supports this evidence-based approach to the management of small intracranial haemorrhages.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Lisa Nichols, Library Coordinator, for her outstanding assistance with every literature search, no matter how small or how large the project. Mercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH [email protected]

Disclosure statement

This research has not been previously published and is not under consideration by any other journal. None of the author(s) have any conflicts of interest to report.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.