110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Building resilience among families supporting relatives with ABI in rural NSW: testing the feasibility of telephone delivery of Strength2Strength program

, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 84-98 | Received 21 Jul 2022, Accepted 09 Jan 2024, Published online: 08 Feb 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Strength2Strength (S2S) is a group psychoeducational program aiming to build resilience among families supporting relatives after traumatic injury.

Objective

To test the feasibility, acceptability and outcomes of teleconference delivery of a 5 hour S2S program in rural New South Wales.

Methods

A mixed methods design investigated the (i) convenience of telephone-based delivery; and (ii) acceptability of the program material (purpose-designed survey and the Narrative Evaluation of Intervention Interview). Program efficacy was measured with the Resilience Scale (RS) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC); the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS); Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 (DASS-21); Carer Assessment of Managing Index (CAMI); and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS). Participant outcome data were collected at baseline, post program and 3 months follow-up.

Results

11 participants supporting adult relatives with severe brain injury completed the program. All participants and facilitators commented positively about the cost, ease of use and quality of the teleconference facility. Statistically significant gains were found between pre-program and follow-up scores on the RS, CD-RISC, PANAS-Positive, and CAMI, with statistically significant reductions found on the DASS-21 Depression Scale and CBS scores.

Conclusion

The study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of telephone–based delivery of S2S to family participants.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Daniella Pfeiffer for assistance in co-facilitating the original pilot group and to Josephine Paasila and Maysaa Daher for their work with data collection and analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.