696
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using ultrasound tongue imaging to identify covert contrasts in children’s speech

, &
Pages 21-34 | Received 05 Feb 2016, Accepted 16 Apr 2016, Published online: 20 Jun 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound tongue imaging has become a promising technique for detecting covert contrasts, due to the developments in data analysis methods that allow for processing information on tongue shape from young children. An important feature concerning analyses of ultrasound data from children who are likely to produce covert contrasts is that the data are likely to be collected without head-to-transducer stabilisation, due to the speakers’ age. This article is a review of the existing methods applicable in analysing data from non-stabilised recordings. The article describes some of the challenges of ultrasound data collection from children, and analysing these data, as well as possible ways to address those challenges. Additionally, there are examples from typical and disordered productions featuring covert contrasts, with illustrations of quantifying differences in tongue shape between target speech sounds.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K002597/1).

Notes

1 Compare these measures with another way of quantifying tongue curvature, reported in Stone et al. (Citation1987), who used the origin of the ultrasound image, i.e. a transducer-based landmark, as a reference point for curvature calculations using tongue contours from adults’ productions. With the reference point for measurements being external to the vocal tract, if such measurements were applied to young children’s productions, the values would likely be affected by children’s head movements in relation to the transducer during the recording.

2 Perceptual similarity was assessed by each of the three authors individually by listening to audio recordings of the realisations of the carrier sentences containing the target consonant-vowel syllables. There was no fixed order of presentation of the three sentences, and no limitation on the number of times that the stimuli could be played back. The task was to determine whether the three target consonants sounded the same to each other, or whether there were any audible differences.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K002597/1).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.