167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Clear versus casual consonant identification by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

&
Pages 734-755 | Received 20 Jun 2019, Accepted 14 Nov 2019, Published online: 04 Dec 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners who benefit from hearing-aid use in quiet often continue to have difficulty understanding speech in noise. Requesting talkers to speak clearly is one strategy to overcome this deficit. Paradoxically, one feature of clear speech is a shift to higher frequencies, which may move speech energy into a frequency range that is inaudible or more distorted for some HI listeners. Casual (or conversational) speech, on the other hand, may shift speech energy into a lower frequency range that is more audible or less distorted. This study examined the intelligibility of 21 amplified, casually- and clearly-spoken, US English coda consonants in nonsense syllables for 10 normal-hearing (NH) and 17 HI listeners. Most clear-speech consonants yielded higher recognition scores as expected. However, certain phonological processes common in casual speech, such as palatalization of higher frequency alveolar into lower frequency postalveolar consonants, generated significantly higher scores than their clear counterparts for some HI listeners in noise. These results have implications for coaching conversational partners of aided HI listeners. For the military, talkers can be instructed how to speak to Service members with hearing loss or in noisy environments.

Acknowledgements

The authors express our gratitude to Jennie Canan, Julie Cohen, Mary Cord, Lauren Evans, Alice Franklin, Lina Kubli, Stefanie Kuchinsky, Tia McDonald, LaGuinn Sherlock, Daniel Shub, Van Summers, Chelsea Vogel, Therese Walden, Danielle Zion, and the two SLPs for their assistance. This research was supported by the Army Hearing Division. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of the Army, Army Medical Department, or the U.S. Government. Use of trademarked names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Army but is intended only to assist in the identification of a specific product. A portion of this research was presented in 2012 at the 164th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America in Kansas City, MO and in 2016 at the 5th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the Acoustical Society of Japan in Honolulu, HI.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.