4,165
Views
53
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Incidental emotions in moral dilemmas: The influence of emotion regulation

&
Pages 64-75 | Received 04 Apr 2013, Accepted 12 Feb 2014, Published online: 10 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

Recent theories have argued that emotions play a central role in moral decision-making and suggested that emotion regulation may be crucial in reducing emotion-linked biases. The present studies focused on the influence of emotional experience and individual differences in emotion regulation on moral choice in dilemmas that pit harming another person against social welfare. During these “harm to save” moral dilemmas, participants experienced mostly fear and sadness but also other emotions such as compassion, guilt, anger, disgust, regret and contempt (Study 1). Fear and disgust were more frequently reported when participants made deontological choices, whereas regret was more frequently reported when participants made utilitarian choices. In addition, habitual reappraisal negatively predicted deontological choices, and this effect was significantly carried through emotional arousal (Study 2). Individual differences in the habitual use of other emotion regulation strategies (i.e., acceptance, rumination and catastrophising) did not influence moral choice. The results of the present studies indicate that negative emotions are commonly experienced during “harm to save” moral dilemmas, and they are associated with a deontological bias. By efficiently reducing emotional arousal, reappraisal can attenuate the emotion-linked deontological bias in moral choice.

View correction statement:
Corrigendum

This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, grant number [PNII-ID-PCCE-2011-2-0045].

We are grateful to the editor, Dr Peter Kuppens, and two anonymous reviewers for helping us to improve this manuscript.

This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, grant number [PNII-ID-PCCE-2011-2-0045].

We are grateful to the editor, Dr Peter Kuppens, and two anonymous reviewers for helping us to improve this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.