From bad to worse: Symbolic equivalence and opposition in fear generalisation

Abstract

The present study compared the impact of symbolic equivalence and opposition relations on fear generalisation. In a procedure using nonsense words, some stimuli became symbolically equivalent to an aversively conditioned stimulus while others were symbolically opposite. The generalisation of fear to symbolically related stimuli was then measured using behavioural avoidance, retrospective unconditioned stimulus expectancy and stimulus valence ratings. Equivalence relations facilitated fear generalisation while opposition relations constrained generalisation. The potential clinical implications of symbolic generalisation are discussed.

Keywords:

• Symbolic generalisation
• Fear
• Avoidance

Thanks to Bram Vervliet for helpful comments and feedback.

This work was supported by the Flemish Research Council [grant number G.0518.11].

Thanks to Bram Vervliet for helpful comments and feedback.

This work was supported by the Flemish Research Council [grant number G.0518.11].

Notes

¹ Nonsense word stimuli: BEH, FIH, CUG, VEP, MAU, SUG, GAJ, ZID, RUV, LER.

² IAPS identifiers: #3000, #3010, #3030, #3051, #3062, #3063, #3064, #3080, #3100, #3102, #3130, #3150.