2,544
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and altruism

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1532-1548 | Received 08 Oct 2019, Accepted 28 May 2020, Published online: 23 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Emotions evoked in response to others’ distress are important for motivating concerned prosocial responses. But how emotion regulation shapes prosocial responding is not yet well understood. We tested the role of empathic emotion regulation in promoting prosocial motivation and costly donations across two studies, first in a community sample and then in a sample of altruistic kidney donors and a matched comparison sample. Participants engaged in hopeful and distancing reappraisals while viewing images of others in distress, then decided whether to help by donating to charity. Whereas hope was expected to evoke approach-based motivation indexed by increased donations, distance was expected to evoke avoidance-based motivation indexed by decreased donations, via varying effects of the two reappraisals on positive and negative affect. Across both studies, both reappraisals decreased negative affect and hopeful reappraisal increased positive affect. In the community sample, hope resulted in higher donations than distancing. Altruists were more prosocial overall, but the associations between affect and donation behaviour in this group mirrored the hopeful reappraisal in the community sample, suggesting that altruists might adopt this strategy by default. These findings clarify the role of empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and also independent effects of positive and negative affect.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by John Templeton Foundation Grant 47861 to AAM. We thank Emily Robertson, Katherine O’Connell, Shivani Goyal, Miriam Crinion, Madeline Smith, and Katrina Zheleznyak for assistance with task preparation, data collection, and analysis. We also thank the participants who contributed their time and energy to this work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Data are available through the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/bju2x/.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by John Templeton Foundation: [Grant Number 47861].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.