846
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Article

Nostalgia strengthens global self-continuity through holistic thinking

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 730-737 | Received 17 Aug 2020, Accepted 04 Dec 2020, Published online: 24 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Nostalgia, a sentimental longing for one’s meaningful past, promotes global self-continuity (GSC), a sense of connection among one’s past, present, and future selves. We identified a cognitive mechanism for this effect: holistic thinking, and in particular interactional causality (presupposing multiple causes that interact to influence an object’s behaviour). In three studies, using measurement-of-mediation and experimental-causal-chain designs, nostalgia was related to, and caused, higher GSC through interactional causality. In cross-sectional Study 1, trait nostalgia was associated with GSC via interactional causality. In Study 2, induced nostalgia led to higher interactional causality and ensuing GSC. In Study 3, manipulated interactional causal thinking increased GSC.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Self-continuity—connection between one’s past and present selves—is also positively associated with psychological benefits; further, nostalgia is associated with, or triggers, self-continuity (Sedikides et al., Citation2015a, Citation2016).

2 Hong et al. (Citation2020, Study 1) reported an alpha of .79 for the same scale.

3 In Choi et al. (Citation2007, ), causality included items 1 (r=.617), 2 (r=.591), 3 (r=.592), 4 (r=.543), 5 (r=.529), and 6 (r=.575). Attitude toward contradiction included items 7 (r=.538), 8 (r=.648), 9 (r=.613), 10 (r=.531), 11 (r=.242), and 12 (r=.376). Perception of change included items 13 (r=.476), 14 (r=.610), 15 (r=.522), 16 (r=.685), 17 (r=.242), 18 (r=.360). Locus of attention included items 19 (r=.671), 20 (r=.652), 21 (r=.628), 22 (r=.706), 23 (r=.415), and 24 (r=.259). The coefficients in brackets are from Study 1. We chose items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, and 22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.