176
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Articulation dynamics and evaluative conditioning: investigating the boundary conditions, mental representation, and origin of the in-out effect

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1074-1089 | Received 23 Mar 2022, Accepted 16 Jun 2023, Published online: 26 Jun 2023
 

ABSTRACT

People prefer linguistic stimuli with an inward (e.g. BODIKA) over those with an outward articulation dynamic (e.g. KODIBA), a phenomenon known as the articulatory in-out effect. Despite its robustness across languages and contexts, the phenomenon is still poorly understood. To learn more about the effect’s boundary conditions, mental representation, and origin, we crossed the in-out effect with evaluative conditioning research. In five experiments (N = 713, three experiments pre-registered), we systematically paired words containing inward versus outward dynamics with pictures of negative versus positive valence. Although this evaluative conditioning procedure reversed the preference for inward over outward words, this was the case only for words with the same consonant sequences as the conditioned words. For words with inward/outward dynamics but different consonant sequences than the conditioned ones, a regular in-out effect emerged. Also, no preference reversal at all emerged for the conditioned consonant sequences when the contingency between single consonants at specific positions and positive/negative valence was zero. Implications of these findings for the in-out effect and evaluative conditioning are discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All data, materials, and analysis scripts can be accessed via https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8QC5D. Experiments 2, 3 and 5 were pre-registered (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6SFBR, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5CMZY, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD8S9).

Notes

1 The effect sizes of the in-out effect were dz = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.14, 0.40], for inward+outward- and dz = 0.22, 95% CI = [0.07, 0.36], for inward-outward+.

2 We thank Karoline Bading for these suggestions.

3 The effect size of the in-out effect was dz = 0.25, CI95% =  [0.13, 0.36]. Effect sizes for each factorial cell are provided in the OSF.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a scholarship from the GESS Mannheim to Moritz Ingendahl and the open science grant of the University of Mannheim to Moritz Ingendahl, Ira Theresa Maschmann, and Tobias Vogel.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.