Adherence and Health-Related Outcomes of Beginner Running Programs: A 10-Week Observational Study

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the determinants of adherence and assess changes in fitness and health outcomes in participants of group-based beginner running programs. Methods: Participants completed adherence diaries (n = 34) during the 10-week program, and underwent fitness and health testing (n = 20) at the program start and end. Diaries included weekly visual analogue scales of enjoyment, motivation, confidence, fatigue, satisfaction, and support along with a record of training sessions. Space was provided for free-text comments. Fitness was assessed by the multi-stage 20-m shuttle run test, and measurements were taken of resting heart rate, blood pressure, body composition, and free-living physical activity. Results: Overall adherence to the 10-week program was 53 ± 27% with injury the most common reason for missing sessions and for discontinuing training. Adherence to group sessions was positively correlated with enjoyment, motivation, confidence, satisfaction with progress, and social support. Qualitative analysis of diary entries indicated three distinct themes (self-awareness, social support, personal challenge) underlying progression through the program. Significant changes were observed after 10 weeks in distance run on the fitness test (+189 ± 133 m), body mass index (−0.54 ± 0.72 kg/m²), and percentage body fat (−1.5 ± 1.6%). Blood pressure, resting heart rate, and physical activity were unchanged. Conclusion: Engagement in beginner running programs was associated with improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition within 10 weeks. A larger and longer-term study is required to determine if these programs can lead to sustained engagement in running and additional health benefits.

KEYWORDS:

• Body composition
• cardiorespiratory fitness
• injury
• motivation

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the Sport and Exercise Beacon of Loughborough University (RA1014). Stacy Clemes is supported by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.