280
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Ocular Surface/Cornea

Effect of Amniotic Membrane Suspension (AMS) and Amniotic Membrane Homogenate (AMH) on Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Viability, Migration and Proliferation In Vitro

, , , &
Pages 351-357 | Received 03 Sep 2015, Accepted 16 May 2016, Published online: 15 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To analyze the effects of different concentrations of amniotic membrane suspension (AMS) or amniotic membrane homogenate (AMH) on human corneal epithelial cell (HCEC) viability, migration and proliferation.

Methods: Amniotic membranes (AMs) of 13 placentas were prepared and stored at −80°C. For AMS preparation, following de-freezing, AM pieces were inserted in six-well plates and 5 ml Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)/F12 (with 5% fetal bovine serum, FBS) per gram tissue was added for 96 h. After removal of the AM, the remaining supernatant was collected for experiments.

For AMH preparation, following de-freezing, AMs were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and 5 ml DMEM/F12 (with 5% FBS) per gram tissue was added. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was collected for experiments.

HCECs were expanded and incubated in DMEM/F12, 5% FBS supplemented by 15%, 30% or 100% AMS or 15% or 30% AMH. Viability was analyzed using Cell Proliferation Kit XTT, migration using wound healing assay and proliferation by the cell proliferation ELISA BrdU kit.

Results: HCEC viability remained unchanged using 15% or 30% AMS (p = 1.0 for both); however, it decreased significantly using 100% AMS (p < 0.001) or 15% (p = 0.041) or 30% AMH (p < 0.001), compared to controls. Using 15% or 30% AMS, HCEC migration increased significantly (p < 0.001 for both). Using 15% or 30% AMH (p = 0.153; p = 0.083), HCEC migration remained unchanged and 100% AMS inhibited HCEC migration (p < 0.001). Next, 15% and 30% AMS had no effect on HCEC proliferation (p = 0.454 and p = 0.119), but 100% AMS (p < 0.001) and 15% (p = 0.002) and 30% AMH (p = 0.001) inhibited HCEC proliferation significantly.

Conclusion: With unchanged HCEC viability and proliferation and increased HCEC migration, 15% and 30% AMS application seems to be the most appropriate method to support epithelial healing.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.