Electro-spun Membranes as Scaffolds for Human Corneal Endothelial Cells

ABSTRACT

Background: Corneal endothelial dysfunction remains the most frequent indication for corneal transplantation, limited by donor material shortage, poor long-term graft survival, or allogeneic graft rejection. Therefore, tissue-engineered endothelial grafts (TEEG) represent a promising alternative to human donor tissue. In this study, we generated electro-spun scaffolds and tested these for their suitability for human corneal endothelial cell (hCEC) cultivation.

Methods: The polymers poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and polycaprolactone (PCL) were spun with equal parameters. HCEC-12 was cultured on the scaffolds for 3 to 7 days. Scaffolds were evaluated by light microscopy, porometry, light transmission, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), live/dead staining and cell viability assay.

Results: Electro-spun fibers from PMMA (2.99 ± 0.24 µm) showed significantly higher diameters than PCL (2.29 ± 0.11 µm; p = 0.003) and PLGA (1.84 ± 0.21 µm; p < 0.001), while fibers from PCL also showed larger diameters than those from PLGA (p = 0.002). PMMA scaffolds (26.77 ± 17.48 µm) had significantly larger interstitial spaces than those from PCL (13.30 ± 5.47 µm; p = 0.04) and PLGA (10.42 ± 6.15 µm; p = 0.002), while PCL and PLGA did not differ significantly (p = 0.26). SEM analysis revealed that only PLGA fibers preserved a normal HCEC-12 morphology. PLGA and PCL did not differ in cell number, death, or viability after 7 days of HCEC-12 cultivation. PMMA showed significantly higher cytotoxicity (p < 0.001; PLGA: 1626.2 ± 183.8 RLU; PMMA: 841.9 ± 92.7 RLU; PCL: 1580.2 ± 171.02 RLU).

Conclusions: The biodegradable PLGA and PCL electro-spun scaffolds resulted in equal biocompatibility, while PMMA showed cytotoxicity. Only PLGA preserved hCEC morphology and consequently seems to be a promising candidate for TEEG construction.

KEYWORDS:

• Cornea
• endothelial cells
• scaffold
• tissue engineering
• electro-spinning

Acknowledgments

We thank the Cornea Bank Aachen for supporting our research. We particularly thank Anna Dobias and Claudia Werner for their assistance.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest and have no proprietary interest in any of the materials mentioned in this article.

Ethics approval

Institutional Ethical Review Board, University RWTH Aachen

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.