Long-Term Changes in Backscattered Light Measurements in Keratoconus Corneas Treated with Collagen Cross-Linking

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Our aim was to compare densitometry data between keratoconus and normal corneas and to assess the long-term changes in corneal backscattered light values after corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) treatment.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 26 eyes of normal patients (age: 32.71 ± 12.68 years) and 39 eyes of keratoconus patients (28.93 ± 7.59 years) using the Pentacam HR corneal densitometry module before CXL and during the postoperative period, which lasted a mean of 2.53 years (range: 1–4 years). Corneal backscattered light values in grey scale unit (GSU) were recorded for the anterior 120 µm, the center layer, and the posterior 60 µm of the cornea in four concentric, central rings. An additional calculation was performed with converting GSU values to GSU/cubic millimeters (mm³) with surface area calculations and using corneal thickness data.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between normal and keratoconus group densitometry values (in GSU/mm³) in all annuli of the center layer; all, but anterior layer of the 10–12 annuli; all annuli of the total thickness and in all values of the total diameter. In all these cases, the normal cornea showed higher GSU/mm³ values compared to keratoconus corneas (p < 0.05). One month after the CXL treatment, the GSU/mm³ data increased significantly in the anterior, the center, and the posterior zone (p < 0.05), followed by its slow decrease. At the end of the follow-up period, the GSU/mm³ values were significantly higher in all three zones compared to those before the CXL treatment (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Densitometry measurements can reflect the changes of optical quality of the cornea. These measurements may play a valuable role in assessing keratoconus and optical changes of the corneas after CXL treatment.

KEYWORDS:

• Backscattered light
• cornea
• collagen cross-linking
• densitometry
• Scheimpflug imaging

Disclosure statement

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This is a retrospective study; therefore, formal consent is not required.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Financial/proprietary interest

The authors have no commercial or proprietary interests in any of the instruments used in this study.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was received for this research.